Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs HMEZX
AEDNX vs HMEZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. HMEZX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and HMEZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMEZX has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. AEDNX (53.7M). HMEZX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: HMEZX (4.98) vs AEDNX (0.18). AEDNX was incepted earlier than HMEZX: AEDNX (15 years) vs HMEZX (9 years). HMEZX (2.10) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.62). HMEZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 406.00 vs. AEDNX (195.00). HMEZX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: HMEZX (2500) vs AEDNX (100000). AEDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. HMEZX (5.29). HMEZX return over 5 years is better than : 22.91 vs. AEDNX (16.71).
| AEDNX | HMEZX | AEDNX / HMEZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.90 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 2.10 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.569 | 4.966 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.7M | 1.21B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 4.98 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 5.29 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.92 | 15.90 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.71 | 22.91 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement