Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs HMECX
AEDNX vs HMECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. HMECX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and HMECX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMECX has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. AEDNX (53.7M). HMECX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: HMECX (4.27) vs AEDNX (0.18). AEDNX was incepted earlier than HMECX: AEDNX (15 years) vs HMECX (9 years). HMECX (3.10) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.62). HMECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 406.00 vs. AEDNX (195.00). HMECX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: HMECX (2500) vs AEDNX (100000). AEDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. HMECX (4.40). HMECX (16.98) and AEDNX (16.71) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AEDNX | HMECX | AEDNX / HMECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.90 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 3.10 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.569 | 4.117 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.7M | 1.21B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 4.27 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 4.40 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.92 | 12.67 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.71 | 16.98 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.30 | N/A | - |