Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs HMECX
AEDNX vs HMECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. HMECX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and HMECX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMECX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. AEDNX (49.8M). HMECX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: HMECX (4.30) vs AEDNX (0.94). AEDNX was incepted earlier than HMECX: AEDNX (15 years) vs HMECX (9 years). HMECX (3.10) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.62). HMECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 406.00 vs. AEDNX (195.00). HMECX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: HMECX (2500) vs AEDNX (100000). AEDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.15 vs. HMECX (4.35). HMECX return over 5 years is better than : 16.66 vs. AEDNX (15.21).
| AEDNX | HMECX | AEDNX / HMECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.90 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 3.10 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.078 | -0.211 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.8M | 1.29B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 4.30 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.15 | 4.35 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.29 | 13.76 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.21 | 16.66 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement