Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs HMECX
AEDNX vs HMECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. HMECX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and HMECX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMECX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. AEDNX (58.5M). HMECX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: HMECX (4.31) vs AEDNX (0.19). AEDNX was incepted earlier than HMECX: AEDNX (15 years) vs HMECX (9 years). HMECX (3.39) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.62). HMECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 406.00 vs. AEDNX (195.00). HMECX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: HMECX (2500) vs AEDNX (100000). AEDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.14 vs. HMECX (4.81). AEDNX return over 5 years is better than : 22.62 vs. HMECX (12.83).
| AEDNX | HMECX | AEDNX / HMECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 3.14 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 3.39 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.728 | 4.282 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.5M | 1.16B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 4.31 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.14 | 4.81 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.01 | 13.48 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.62 | 12.83 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement