Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs HHCAX
AEDNX vs HHCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. HHCAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and HHCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HHCAX has more cash in the bank: 85.8M vs. AEDNX (59.4M). HHCAX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: HHCAX (0.22) vs AEDNX (0.19). AEDNX was incepted earlier than HHCAX: AEDNX (15 years) vs HHCAX (17 years). HHCAX (3.42) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.50). HHCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. AEDNX (195.00). HHCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: HHCAX (2500) vs AEDNX (100000). AEDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.91 vs. HHCAX (4.77). AEDNX return over 5 years is better than : 23.36 vs. HHCAX (3.82).
| AEDNX | HHCAX | AEDNX / HHCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.73 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 3.42 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.140 | 3.654 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.4M | 85.8M | 69% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.22 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.91 | 4.77 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.32 | 17.33 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.36 | 3.82 | 612% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.52 | 11.66 | 433% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers