Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs GABCX
AEDNX vs GABCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. GABCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and GABCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GABCX has more cash in the bank: 419M vs. AEDNX (49.8M). GABCX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: GABCX (2.78) vs AEDNX (0.94). AEDNX was incepted earlier than GABCX: AEDNX (15 years) vs GABCX (33 years). AEDNX (1.62) is less costly to investors than GABCX (0.87). AEDNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 195.00 vs. GABCX (155.00). GABCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: GABCX (1000) vs AEDNX (100000). AEDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.59 vs. GABCX (5.09). GABCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.67 vs. AEDNX (15.42).
| AEDNX | GABCX | AEDNX / GABCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.87 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.87 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.078 | 1.564 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.8M | 419M | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 2.78 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.59 | 5.09 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.29 | 17.93 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.42 | 16.67 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.40 | 28.97 | 184% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement