Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs EMACX
AEDNX vs EMACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. EMACX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and EMACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMACX has more cash in the bank: 56.5M vs. AEDNX (49.8M). AEDNX pays higher dividends than EMACX: AEDNX (0.94) vs EMACX (0.43). AEDNX was incepted earlier than EMACX: AEDNX (15 years) vs EMACX (25 years). EMACX (2.62) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.62). AEDNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 195.00 vs. EMACX (100.00). EMACX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: EMACX (1000) vs AEDNX (100000). EMACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.61 vs. AEDNX (7.59). AEDNX return over 5 years is better than : 15.42 vs. EMACX (11.18).
| AEDNX | EMACX | AEDNX / EMACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.62 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 2.62 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.078 | 3.259 | -2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.8M | 56.5M | 88% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.43 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.59 | 18.61 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.29 | 21.43 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.42 | 11.18 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.40 | 30.23 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement