Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs EMAAX
AEDNX vs EMAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. EMAAX commentary
Feb 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and EMAAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMAAX has more cash in the bank: 56.9M vs. AEDNX (49.8M). EMAAX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: EMAAX (1.13) vs AEDNX (0.94). AEDNX was incepted earlier than EMAAX: AEDNX (15 years) vs EMAAX (25 years). EMAAX (1.87) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.62). AEDNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 195.00 vs. EMAAX (100.00). EMAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: EMAAX (1000) vs AEDNX (100000). EMAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.01 vs. AEDNX (7.15). EMAAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.39 vs. AEDNX (15.21).
| AEDNX | EMAAX | AEDNX / EMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.87 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 1.87 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.078 | 3.957 | -2% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.8M | 56.9M | 88% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.13 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.15 | 19.01 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.29 | 24.81 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.21 | 16.39 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.40 | 42.17 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement