Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs EMAAX
AEDNX vs EMAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. EMAAX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and EMAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMAAX has more cash in the bank: 54.4M vs. AEDNX (50.1M). EMAAX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: EMAAX (1.16) vs AEDNX (0.95). AEDNX was incepted earlier than EMAAX: AEDNX (15 years) vs EMAAX (25 years). EMAAX (1.87) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.62). AEDNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 195.00 vs. EMAAX (100.00). EMAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: EMAAX (1000) vs AEDNX (100000). EMAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.28 vs. AEDNX (7.84). EMAAX (16.84) and AEDNX (16.40) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AEDNX | EMAAX | AEDNX / EMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.87 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 1.87 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.234 | 2.599 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.1M | 54.4M | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.16 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | 19.28 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.55 | 25.10 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.40 | 16.84 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.30 | 41.21 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement