Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs CMRAX
AEDNX vs CMRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. CMRAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and CMRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEDNX has more cash in the bank: 49.8M vs. CMRAX (2.71M). CMRAX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: CMRAX (1.09) vs AEDNX (0.94). AEDNX was incepted earlier than CMRAX: AEDNX (15 years) vs CMRAX (2 years). CMRAX (12.56) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.62). AEDNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 195.00 vs. CMRAX (177.00). CMRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: CMRAX (2500) vs AEDNX (100000). AEDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.59 vs. CMRAX (4.28).
| AEDNX | CMRAX | AEDNX / CMRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.16 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 12.56 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 2 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.078 | 0.395 | -20% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.8M | 2.71M | 1,838% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.09 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.59 | 4.28 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.29 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.42 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.40 | -54.78 | -97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement