Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs ARBFX
AEDNX vs ARBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. ARBFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and ARBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARBFX has more cash in the bank: 781M vs. AEDNX (50.1M). AEDNX pays higher dividends than ARBFX: AEDNX (0.95) vs ARBFX (0.19). AEDNX was incepted earlier than ARBFX: AEDNX (15 years) vs ARBFX (25 years). ARBFX (1.71) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.62). AEDNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 195.00 vs. ARBFX (162.00). ARBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: ARBFX (2000) vs AEDNX (100000). AEDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. ARBFX (3.80). AEDNX return over 5 years is better than : 16.40 vs. ARBFX (5.86).
| AEDNX | ARBFX | AEDNX / ARBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.71 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 1.71 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.234 | 0.297 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.1M | 781M | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.19 | 508% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | 3.80 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.55 | 10.82 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.40 | 5.86 | 280% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.30 | 10.69 | 517% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement