Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs ARBFX
AEDNX vs ARBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. ARBFX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and ARBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARBFX has more cash in the bank: 783M vs. AEDNX (55.5M). ARBFX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: ARBFX (0.42) vs AEDNX (0.18). AEDNX was incepted earlier than ARBFX: AEDNX (15 years) vs ARBFX (25 years). ARBFX (1.71) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.62). AEDNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 195.00 vs. ARBFX (162.00). ARBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: ARBFX (2000) vs AEDNX (100000). AEDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.07 vs. ARBFX (7.97). AEDNX return over 5 years is better than : 20.60 vs. ARBFX (4.42).
| AEDNX | ARBFX | AEDNX / ARBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.71 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 1.71 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.579 | 7.985 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55.5M | 783M | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.42 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.07 | 7.97 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.80 | 11.61 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.60 | 4.42 | 466% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.15 | 11.76 | 460% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement