Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs ARBFX
AEDNX vs ARBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. ARBFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and ARBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARBFX has more cash in the bank: 733M vs. AEDNX (59.8M). ARBFX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: ARBFX (0.43) vs AEDNX (0.19). AEDNX was incepted earlier than ARBFX: AEDNX (15 years) vs ARBFX (25 years). ARBFX (1.78) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.50). AEDNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 305.00 vs. ARBFX (230.00). ARBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: ARBFX (2000) vs AEDNX (100000). AEDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.48 vs. ARBFX (5.18). AEDNX return over 5 years is better than : 23.92 vs. ARBFX (4.11).
| AEDNX | ARBFX | AEDNX / ARBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.78 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.78 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.803 | 5.194 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.8M | 733M | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.43 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.48 | 5.18 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.87 | 7.62 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.92 | 4.11 | 582% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.03 | 8.53 | 504% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement