AEDFF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
3.67B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PINE
Price
$16.40
Change
-$0.08 (-0.49%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
232.3M
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEDFF vs PINE

Header iconAEDFF vs PINE Comparison
Open Charts AEDFF vs PINEBanner chart's image
Aedifica Sicafi, Bruxelles
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.67B
Alpine Income Property Trust
Price$16.40
Change-$0.08 (-0.49%)
Volume$84.25K
Capitalization232.3M
AEDFF vs PINE Comparison Chart in %
PINE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEDFF vs. PINE commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDFF is a Hold and PINE is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AEDFF: $74.50 vs. PINE: $16.40)
Brand notoriety: AEDFF and PINE are both not notable
AEDFF represents the Managed Health Care, while PINE is part of the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEDFF: 100% vs. PINE: 89%
Market capitalization -- AEDFF: $3.67B vs. PINE: $232.3M
AEDFF [@Managed Health Care] is valued at $3.67B. PINE’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $232.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $131.14B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $9.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEDFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePINE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AEDFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PINE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PINE is a better buy in the long-term than AEDFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PINE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PINE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

AEDFF (@Managed Health Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PINE (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +9.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.51%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

PINE is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Managed Health Care (+1.55% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.37% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEDFF($3.67B) has a higher market cap than PINE($232M). PINE has higher P/E ratio than AEDFF: PINE (180.75) vs AEDFF (17.33). AEDFF YTD gains are higher at: 28.837 vs. PINE (3.721). AEDFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 292M vs. PINE (39.5M). PINE has less debt than AEDFF: PINE (360M) vs AEDFF (2.58B). AEDFF has higher revenues than PINE: AEDFF (363M) vs PINE (56.3M).
AEDFFPINEAEDFF / PINE
Capitalization3.67B232M1,580%
EBITDA292M39.5M739%
Gain YTD28.8373.721775%
P/E Ratio17.33180.7510%
Revenue363M56.3M645%
Total Cash61.8MN/A-
Total Debt2.58B360M717%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PINE: Fundamental Ratings
PINE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEDFFPINE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PINE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FULO0.420.02
+3.95%
FullNet Communications, Inc.
TSMCF0.15N/A
+0.69%
TESMEC S P A
AKAAF80.75N/A
N/A
Aker AS
MEIYF12.29N/A
N/A
Mercialys Paris
TSCDF5.75-0.27
-4.49%
Tesco PLC

AEDFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEDFF has been loosely correlated with ARLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AEDFF jumps, then ARLLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEDFF
1D Price
Change %
AEDFF100%
N/A
ARLLF - AEDFF
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CCPPF - AEDFF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DHC - AEDFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTST - AEDFF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
PINE - AEDFF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
More

PINE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINE has been loosely correlated with GTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINE jumps, then GTY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PINE
1D Price
Change %
PINE100%
+1.60%
GTY - PINE
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
GLPI - PINE
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
FCPT - PINE
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
EPRT - PINE
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
STAG - PINE
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
More