AEDFF
Price
$70.71
Change
+$8.21 (+13.14%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
3.28B
PINE
Price
$16.47
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 21, 01:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
208.08M
3 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AEDFF vs PINE

Header iconAEDFF vs PINE Comparison
Open Charts AEDFF vs PINEBanner chart's image
Aedifica Sicafi, Bruxelles
Price$70.71
Change+$8.21 (+13.14%)
Volume$323
Capitalization3.28B
Alpine Income Property Trust
Price$16.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization208.08M
AEDFF vs PINE Comparison Chart
Loading...
PINE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEDFF vs. PINE commentary
Apr 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDFF is a Hold and PINE is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2025
Stock price -- (AEDFF: $70.71 vs. PINE: $16.47)
Brand notoriety: AEDFF and PINE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEDFF: 119% vs. PINE: 96%
Market capitalization -- AEDFF: $3.28B vs. PINE: $208.08M
AEDFF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $3.28B. PINE’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $208.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEDFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePINE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AEDFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PINE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PINE is a better buy in the long-term than AEDFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PINE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PINE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

AEDFF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PINE (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +7.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

PINE is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.20% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEDFF($3.28B) has a higher market cap than PINE($208M). PINE has higher P/E ratio than AEDFF: PINE (81.58) vs AEDFF (10.54). AEDFF YTD gains are higher at: 22.283 vs. PINE (-0.137). AEDFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 274M vs. PINE (38.5M). AEDFF has more cash in the bank: 19.1M vs. PINE (4.02M). PINE has less debt than AEDFF: PINE (282M) vs AEDFF (2.47B). AEDFF has higher revenues than PINE: AEDFF (289M) vs PINE (45M).
AEDFFPINEAEDFF / PINE
Capitalization3.28B208M1,575%
EBITDA274M38.5M712%
Gain YTD22.283-0.137-16,261%
P/E Ratio10.5481.5813%
Revenue289M45M642%
Total Cash19.1M4.02M475%
Total Debt2.47B282M874%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PINE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PINE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
SPY526.410.75
+0.14%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X85174.305000110.898440
+0.13%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

AEDFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AEDFF and MNARF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AEDFF and MNARF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEDFF
1D Price
Change %
AEDFF100%
N/A
MNARF - AEDFF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCPPF - AEDFF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NREF - AEDFF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
SVC - AEDFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
PINE - AEDFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More

PINE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINE has been loosely correlated with OLP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINE jumps, then OLP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PINE
1D Price
Change %
PINE100%
+0.37%
OLP - PINE
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
FCPT - PINE
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BNL - PINE
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
VICI - PINE
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
GLPI - PINE
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
More