AEDFF
Price
$74.50
Change
+$1.42 (+1.94%)
Updated
Jul 28 closing price
Capitalization
3.62B
NTST
Price
$18.79
Change
+$0.02 (+0.11%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.8B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEDFF vs NTST

Header iconAEDFF vs NTST Comparison
Open Charts AEDFF vs NTSTBanner chart's image
Aedifica Sicafi, Bruxelles
Price$74.50
Change+$1.42 (+1.94%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.62B
NetSTREIT
Price$18.79
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
Volume$888.8K
Capitalization1.8B
AEDFF vs NTST Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AEDFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEDFF vs. NTST commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDFF is a Hold and NTST is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AEDFF: $74.50 vs. NTST: $18.79)
Brand notoriety: AEDFF and NTST are both not notable
AEDFF represents the Managed Health Care, while NTST is part of the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEDFF: 52% vs. NTST: 73%
Market capitalization -- AEDFF: $3.62B vs. NTST: $1.8B
AEDFF [@Managed Health Care] is valued at $3.62B. NTST’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $116.34B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $8.44B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEDFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AEDFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NTST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AEDFF and NTST are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEDFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTST’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEDFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NTST’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AEDFF is a better buy in the short-term than NTST.

Price Growth

AEDFF (@Managed Health Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NTST (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

NTST is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Managed Health Care (+0.35% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.35% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEDFF($3.62B) has a higher market cap than NTST($1.8B). NTST has higher P/E ratio than AEDFF: NTST (188.63) vs AEDFF (17.19). NTST YTD gains are higher at: 36.458 vs. AEDFF (28.837). AEDFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 292M vs. NTST (118M). AEDFF has more cash in the bank: 61.8M vs. NTST (19.7M). NTST has less debt than AEDFF: NTST (954M) vs AEDFF (2.58B). AEDFF has higher revenues than NTST: AEDFF (363M) vs NTST (166M).
AEDFFNTSTAEDFF / NTST
Capitalization3.62B1.8B201%
EBITDA292M118M247%
Gain YTD28.83736.45879%
P/E Ratio17.19188.639%
Revenue363M166M219%
Total Cash61.8M19.7M314%
Total Debt2.58B954M271%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEDFFNTST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEDFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MICFF5.23N/A
N/A
Mint Income Fund
DYLG26.57N/A
-0.01%
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & GrowthETF
EWM24.98-0.05
-0.20%
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF
SQEW34.48-0.13
-0.39%
LeaderShares® Equity Skew ETF
AWF11.12-0.05
-0.45%
ALLIANCEBERSTEIN GLOBAL HIGH Income FUND

AEDFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AEDFF and MNARF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AEDFF and MNARF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEDFF
1D Price
Change %
AEDFF100%
N/A
MNARF - AEDFF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCPPF - AEDFF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PINE - AEDFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
NTST - AEDFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
ACDSF - AEDFF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NTST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTST has been closely correlated with GTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTST jumps, then GTY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTST
1D Price
Change %
NTST100%
+0.11%
GTY - NTST
68%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
ADC - NTST
66%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
EPRT - NTST
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
O - NTST
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
FCPT - NTST
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
More