AEDFF
Price
$73.08
Change
-$5.94 (-7.52%)
Updated
May 16 closing price
Capitalization
3.28B
MNARF
Price
$13.39
Change
+$0.16 (+1.21%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
481.15M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEDFF vs MNARF

Header iconAEDFF vs MNARF Comparison
Open Charts AEDFF vs MNARFBanner chart's image
Aedifica Sicafi, Bruxelles
Price$73.08
Change-$5.94 (-7.52%)
Volume$236
Capitalization3.28B
Morguard North American Residential Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$13.39
Change+$0.16 (+1.21%)
Volume$7.9K
Capitalization481.15M
AEDFF vs MNARF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AEDFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEDFF vs. MNARF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDFF is a Hold and MNARF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AEDFF: $73.08 vs. MNARF: $13.39)
Brand notoriety: AEDFF and MNARF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEDFF: 109% vs. MNARF: 247%
Market capitalization -- AEDFF: $3.28B vs. MNARF: $481.15M
AEDFF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $3.28B. MNARF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $481.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEDFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNARF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AEDFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNARF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNARF is a better buy in the long-term than AEDFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEDFF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNARF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEDFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MNARF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNARF is a better buy in the short-term than AEDFF.

Price Growth

AEDFF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MNARF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.40% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEDFF($3.28B) has a higher market cap than MNARF($481M). AEDFF has higher P/E ratio than MNARF: AEDFF (10.54) vs MNARF (7.64). AEDFF YTD gains are higher at: 26.381 vs. MNARF (11.863). AEDFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 274M vs. MNARF (196M). MNARF has more cash in the bank: 24.2M vs. AEDFF (19.1M). MNARF has less debt than AEDFF: MNARF (1.58B) vs AEDFF (2.47B). MNARF (293M) and AEDFF (289M) have equivalent revenues.
AEDFFMNARFAEDFF / MNARF
Capitalization3.28B481M681%
EBITDA274M196M140%
Gain YTD26.38111.863222%
P/E Ratio10.547.64138%
Revenue289M293M99%
Total Cash19.1M24.2M79%
Total Debt2.47B1.58B156%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNARF: Fundamental Ratings
MNARF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55
SMR RATING
1..100
82
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEDFFMNARF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEDFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGCCX97.791.21
+1.25%
Gabelli Growth C
GSLLX22.950.20
+0.88%
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity Inv
PARWX56.170.32
+0.57%
Parnassus Value Equity Investor
HLFZX8.760.03
+0.34%
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg MktsInstZ
NZDEUR0.51-0.00
-0.21%
New Zealand Dollar - Euro

AEDFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AEDFF and MNARF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AEDFF and MNARF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEDFF
1D Price
Change %
AEDFF100%
N/A
MNARF - AEDFF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCPPF - AEDFF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NREF - AEDFF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
SVC - AEDFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
PINE - AEDFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
More

MNARF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNARF has been loosely correlated with CCPPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNARF jumps, then CCPPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNARF
1D Price
Change %
MNARF100%
N/A
CCPPF - MNARF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AEDFF - MNARF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRFIF - MNARF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRDEF - MNARF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWHUF - MNARF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
More