It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEDFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDHC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
AEDFF (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DHC (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was +0.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.46%.
DHC is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.
The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
| AEDFF | DHC | AEDFF / DHC | |
| Capitalization | 4.06B | 1.29B | 314% |
| EBITDA | 351M | 123M | 285% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 10.309 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 17.33 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 368M | 1.54B | 24% |
| Total Cash | 20.5M | 201M | 10% |
| Total Debt | 2.5B | 2.72B | 92% |
AEDFF | DHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AEDFF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as DHC (40). This means that AEDFF’s stock grew similarly to DHC’s over the last 12 months.
DHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as AEDFF (100). This means that DHC’s stock grew similarly to AEDFF’s over the last 12 months.
AEDFF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as DHC (95). This means that AEDFF’s stock grew similarly to DHC’s over the last 12 months.
DHC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as AEDFF (52). This means that DHC’s stock grew similarly to AEDFF’s over the last 12 months.
AEDFF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as DHC (100). This means that AEDFF’s stock grew similarly to DHC’s over the last 12 months.
| AEDFF | DHC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 22% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 58% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEDFF has been loosely correlated with ARLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AEDFF jumps, then ARLLF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEDFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEDFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ARLLF - AEDFF | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CCPPF - AEDFF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DHC - AEDFF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| NTST - AEDFF | -4% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
| PINE - AEDFF | -5% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DHC has been loosely correlated with DBRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DHC jumps, then DBRG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DHC | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| DBRG - DHC | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| RIOCF - DHC | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| PLYM - DHC | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| LTC - DHC | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| SRRTF - DHC | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.38% | ||
More | ||||