It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADYYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWRDLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADYYF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRDLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ADYYF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.36% price change this week, while WRDLY (@Packaged Software) price change was +9.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.40%.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
ADYYF | WRDLY | ADYYF / WRDLY | |
Capitalization | 57.8B | 3.31B | 1,745% |
EBITDA | 796M | 768M | 104% |
Gain YTD | 19.212 | -47.253 | -41% |
P/E Ratio | 90.09 | 12.87 | 700% |
Revenue | 8.94B | 4.02B | 223% |
Total Cash | 6.45B | 1.17B | 551% |
Total Debt | 203M | 5.05B | 4% |
ADYYF | WRDLY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WRDLY's Valuation (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADYYF (76). This means that WRDLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADYYF’s over the last 12 months.
ADYYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRDLY (100). This means that ADYYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.
ADYYF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRDLY (90). This means that ADYYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.
ADYYF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as WRDLY (42). This means that ADYYF’s stock grew similarly to WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.
ADYYF's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as WRDLY (99). This means that ADYYF’s stock grew similarly to WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.
ADYYF | WRDLY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago87% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago55% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago54% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago54% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago76% | 9 days ago55% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADYYF has been closely correlated with ADYEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADYYF jumps, then ADYEY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADYYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ADYYF | 100% | -1.89% | ||
ADYEY - ADYYF | 82% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
WIGBY - ADYYF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
NTDOY - ADYYF | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.88% | ||
WRDLY - ADYYF | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.30% | ||
NTDOF - ADYYF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRDLY has been loosely correlated with OLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRDLY jumps, then OLO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WRDLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WRDLY | 100% | -1.30% | ||
OLO - WRDLY | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
FALC - WRDLY | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
NEXXY - WRDLY | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
EVCM - WRDLY | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
ADYEY - WRDLY | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
More |