ADSK
Price
$305.13
Change
+$0.20 (+0.07%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
55.71B
65 days until earnings call
ZM
Price
$78.38
Change
+$1.42 (+1.85%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
20.11B
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ADSK vs ZM

Header iconADSK vs ZM Comparison
Open Charts ADSK vs ZMBanner chart's image
Autodesk
Price$305.13
Change+$0.20 (+0.07%)
Volume$1.7M
Capitalization55.71B
Zoom Communications
Price$78.38
Change+$1.42 (+1.85%)
Volume$3.41M
Capitalization20.11B
ADSK vs ZM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ADSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ADSK vs. ZM commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADSK is a Buy and ZM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ADSK: $305.13 vs. ZM: $76.96)
Brand notoriety: ADSK and ZM are both notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ADSK: 118% vs. ZM: 0%
Market capitalization -- ADSK: $55.71B vs. ZM: $20.11B
ADSK [@Packaged Software] is valued at $55.71B. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $20.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ADSK’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ADSK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ADSK is a better buy in the long-term than ZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ADSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ADSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ADSK is a better buy in the short-term than ZM.

Price Growth

ADSK (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.66% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

ADSK is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2025.

ZM is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ADSK($55.7B) has a higher market cap than ZM($20.1B). ADSK has higher P/E ratio than ZM: ADSK (61.92) vs ZM (31.27). ADSK YTD gains are higher at: 3.234 vs. ZM (-5.698). ADSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.16B vs. ZM (630M). ZM has more cash in the bank: 6.96B vs. ADSK (2.07B). ZM has less debt than ADSK: ZM (73M) vs ADSK (2.67B). ADSK has higher revenues than ZM: ADSK (5.21B) vs ZM (4.53B).
ADSKZMADSK / ZM
Capitalization55.7B20.1B277%
EBITDA1.16B630M184%
Gain YTD3.234-5.698-57%
P/E Ratio61.9231.27198%
Revenue5.21B4.53B115%
Total Cash2.07B6.96B30%
Total Debt2.67B73M3,651%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ADSK vs ZM: Fundamental Ratings
ADSK
ZM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1272
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63100
SMR RATING
1..100
2261
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2642
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZM's Valuation (70) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (82). This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.

ADSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (100). This means that ADSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.

ADSK's SMR Rating (22) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (61). This means that ADSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.

ADSK's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ZM (52). This means that ADSK’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.

ADSK's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ZM (42). This means that ADSK’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ADSKZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ADSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SURE117.181.03
+0.89%
AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF
ACP5.890.03
+0.51%
abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund
SMLV125.150.14
+0.11%
SPDR® SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatil ETF
HYKE24.75N/A
N/A
Vest 2 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF
SHY82.80-0.03
-0.04%
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF

ADSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADSK has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADSK jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ADSK
1D Price
Change %
ADSK100%
+0.07%
CRM - ADSK
68%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
PTC - ADSK
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
ANSS - ADSK
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
QTWO - ADSK
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
AVPT - ADSK
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More

ZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZM
1D Price
Change %
ZM100%
N/A
PATH - ZM
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
RNG - ZM
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
CRM - ZM
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
HUBS - ZM
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
ADSK - ZM
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More