It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADSK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMANH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADSK’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MANH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ADSK (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.98% price change this week, while MANH (@Packaged Software) price change was +8.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.66%.
ADSK is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2025.
MANH is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
ADSK | MANH | ADSK / MANH | |
Capitalization | 55.7B | 15.4B | 362% |
EBITDA | 1.16B | 216M | 537% |
Gain YTD | 1.830 | -24.959 | -7% |
P/E Ratio | 61.92 | 87.79 | 71% |
Revenue | 5.21B | 929M | 561% |
Total Cash | 2.07B | 271M | 765% |
Total Debt | 2.67B | 17.7M | 15,056% |
ADSK | MANH | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 28 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ADSK's Valuation (81) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MANH (88). This means that ADSK’s stock grew similarly to MANH’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (70). This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's SMR Rating (14) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (22). This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MANH (55). This means that ADSK’s stock grew similarly to MANH’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MANH (78). This means that ADSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than MANH’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK | MANH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 3 days ago63% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 3 days ago57% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 3 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago51% | 3 days ago57% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 3 days ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 3 days ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 8 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago65% | 4 days ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 3 days ago65% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
RSPR | 36.14 | 0.72 | +2.03% |
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Real Estt ETF | |||
BYRE | 25.97 | 0.36 | +1.41% |
Principal Real Estate Active Opp ETF | |||
QINT | 58.42 | 0.29 | +0.50% |
American Century Quality Dvrs Intl ETF | |||
FNCL | 74.89 | 0.35 | +0.47% |
Fidelity MSCI Financials ETF | |||
DCAP | 21.38 | N/A | N/A |
Unity Wealth Partners Dynamic Capital Appreciation & Options ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADSK has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADSK jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ADSK | 100% | +0.52% | ||
CRM - ADSK | 68% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
QTWO - ADSK | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
PANW - ADSK | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
NOW - ADSK | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
WDAY - ADSK | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
More |