Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADOZX vs NLSIX
ADOZX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts ADOZX vs NLSIX
Alger Dynamic Opportunities Z
Price$22.72
Change-$0.99 (-4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets230.09M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
ADOZX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADOZX vs. NLSIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADOZX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. ADOZX (230M). ADOZX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: ADOZX (0.45) vs NLSIX (0.05). ADOZX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: ADOZX (15 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). ADOZX (1.75) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). ADOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 376.53 vs. NLSIX (0.96). ADOZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: ADOZX (500000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.79 vs. ADOZX (1.11). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 21.63 vs. ADOZX (7.90).
| ADOZX | NLSIX | ADOZX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.32 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.32 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.153 | -0.597 | 360% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 8.16B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.05 | 892% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.11 | 3.79 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | 26.67 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.90 | 21.63 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.04 | 71.37 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers