Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADOZX vs NLSIX
ADOZX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts ADOZX vs NLSIX
Alger Dynamic Opportunities Z
Price$22.47
Change-$0.11 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.49M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.25
Change-$0.13 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.32B
ADOZX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADOZX vs. NLSIX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADOZX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.32B vs. ADOZX (207M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than ADOZX: NLSIX (0.02) vs ADOZX (0.00). ADOZX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: ADOZX (14 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). ADOZX (1.75) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). ADOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSIX (48.00). ADOZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: ADOZX (500000) vs NLSIX (1000000). ADOZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. NLSIX (7.57). ADOZX return over 5 years is better than : 35.61 vs. NLSIX (30.11).
| ADOZX | NLSIX | ADOZX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.32 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.32 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.650 | 2.667 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 207M | 7.32B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.09 | 7.57 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.68 | 19.84 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.61 | 30.11 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.13 | 48.46 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers