Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADOZX vs NLSCX
ADOZX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts ADOZX vs NLSCX
Alger Dynamic Opportunities Z
Price$23.40
Change-$0.06 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.12M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.83
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
ADOZX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADOZX vs. NLSCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADOZX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8B vs. ADOZX (229M). ADOZX (0.00) and NLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . ADOZX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: ADOZX (15 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than ADOZX (1.75). ADOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ADOZX: NLSCX (1000) vs ADOZX (500000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. ADOZX (5.26). ADOZX return over 5 years is better than : 17.77 vs. NLSCX (15.78).
| ADOZX | NLSCX | ADOZX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.43 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.43 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.898 | 6.614 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 8B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.26 | 6.13 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.10 | 17.00 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.77 | 15.78 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.96 | 45.22 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement