Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADOZX vs NLSCX
ADOZX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts ADOZX vs NLSCX
Alger Dynamic Opportunities Z
Price$22.72
Change-$0.99 (-4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets230.09M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
ADOZX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADOZX vs. NLSCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADOZX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. ADOZX (230M). ADOZX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: ADOZX (0.45) vs NLSCX (0.00). ADOZX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: ADOZX (15 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than ADOZX (1.75). ADOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 376.53 vs. NLSCX (0.96). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ADOZX: NLSCX (1000) vs ADOZX (500000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. ADOZX (1.11). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.66 vs. ADOZX (7.90).
| ADOZX | NLSCX | ADOZX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.43 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.43 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.153 | -0.693 | 311% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 8.16B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.11 | 2.65 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | 22.54 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.90 | 14.66 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.04 | 52.68 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers