Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADOCX vs NLSIX
ADOCX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts ADOCX vs NLSIX
Alger Dynamic Opportunities C
Price$19.46
Change+$0.07 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets227.29M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.02
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.81B
ADOCX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADOCX vs. NLSIX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADOCX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.81B vs. ADOCX (227M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than ADOCX: NLSIX (0.02) vs ADOCX (0.00). ADOCX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: ADOCX (15 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). ADOCX (2.83) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). ADOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSIX (48.00). ADOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: ADOCX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). ADOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.85 vs. NLSIX (8.77). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 26.81 vs. ADOCX (18.41).
| ADOCX | NLSIX | ADOCX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.83 | 1.32 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.83 | 1.32 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.386 | 6.773 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 227M | 7.81B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.85 | 8.77 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.01 | 25.02 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.41 | 26.81 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.04 | 65.84 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement