Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADOCX vs NLSCX
ADOCX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts ADOCX vs NLSCX
Alger Dynamic Opportunities C
Price$19.46
Change+$0.07 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets227.29M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.78
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.83B
ADOCX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADOCX vs. NLSCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADOCX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.83B vs. ADOCX (227M). ADOCX (0.00) and NLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . ADOCX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: ADOCX (15 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). ADOCX (2.83) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). ADOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSCX (48.00). ADOCX (1000) and NLSCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ADOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.85 vs. NLSCX (7.58). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 19.59 vs. ADOCX (18.41).
| ADOCX | NLSCX | ADOCX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.83 | 2.43 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.83 | 2.43 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.386 | 5.936 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 227M | 7.83B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.85 | 7.58 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.01 | 20.67 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.41 | 19.59 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.04 | 47.95 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement