Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADOCX vs NLSCX
ADOCX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts ADOCX vs NLSCX
Alger Dynamic Opportunities C
Price$18.88
Change-$0.80 (-4.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets230.09M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
ADOCX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADOCX vs. NLSCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADOCX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. ADOCX (230M). ADOCX (0.00) and NLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . ADOCX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: ADOCX (15 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). ADOCX (2.83) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). ADOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 376.53 vs. NLSCX (0.96). ADOCX (1000) and NLSCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. ADOCX (0.05). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.66 vs. ADOCX (1.51).
| ADOCX | NLSCX | ADOCX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.83 | 2.43 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.83 | 2.43 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.227 | -0.693 | 321% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 8.16B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.05 | 2.65 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.85 | 22.54 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.51 | 14.66 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.11 | 52.68 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers