ADNT
Price
$24.62
Change
-$0.09 (-0.36%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2B
39 days until earnings call
NMAKF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
683.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ADNT vs NMAKF

Header iconADNT vs NMAKF Comparison
Open Charts ADNT vs NMAKFBanner chart's image
Adient
Price$24.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.36%)
Volume$7.18K
Capitalization2B
NEMAK S A B DE C V
Price$0.17
Change-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Volume$862
Capitalization683.45M
ADNT vs NMAKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ADNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMAKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ADNT vs. NMAKF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADNT is a Buy and NMAKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ADNT: $24.62 vs. NMAKF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: ADNT and NMAKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ADNT: 18% vs. NMAKF: 99%
Market capitalization -- ADNT: $2.01B vs. NMAKF: $682.92M
ADNT [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.01B. NMAKF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $682.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ADNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNMAKF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ADNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NMAKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMAKF is a better buy in the long-term than ADNT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ADNT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMAKF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ADNT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NMAKF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ADNT and NMAKF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ADNT (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +0.12% price change this week, while NMAKF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

ADNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.66% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ADNT($2B) has a higher market cap than NMAKF($683M). ADNT has higher P/E ratio than NMAKF: ADNT (86.55) vs NMAKF (19.14). NMAKF YTD gains are higher at: 83.913 vs. ADNT (42.890). NMAKF (444M) and ADNT (434M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . ADNT has more cash in the bank: 860M vs. NMAKF (335M). NMAKF has less debt than ADNT: NMAKF (1.92B) vs ADNT (2.39B). ADNT has higher revenues than NMAKF: ADNT (14.4B) vs NMAKF (4.92B).
ADNTNMAKFADNT / NMAKF
Capitalization2B683M293%
EBITDA434M444M98%
Gain YTD42.89083.91351%
P/E Ratio86.5519.14452%
Revenue14.4B4.92B293%
Total Cash860M335M257%
Total Debt2.39B1.92B125%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ADNT: Fundamental Ratings
ADNT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ADNTNMAKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ADNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMAKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLGEX55.490.50
+0.91%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth I
PRKAX7.770.05
+0.65%
PGIM Real Estate Income A
JIIGX85.800.49
+0.57%
JPMorgan US Sustainable Leaders R6
PQIRX26.43N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Equity Income R
OGINX46.55N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Opportunities R

ADNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADNT has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADNT jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ADNT
1D Price
Change %
ADNT100%
-0.36%
LEA - ADNT
78%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
VC - ADNT
78%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
MGA - ADNT
74%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
ALV - ADNT
72%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
BWA - ADNT
72%
Closely correlated
+1.50%
More

NMAKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMAKF and LAZR have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMAKF and LAZR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMAKF
1D Price
Change %
NMAKF100%
N/A
LAZR - NMAKF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.16%
ADNT - NMAKF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
PASTF - NMAKF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PHIN - NMAKF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
SCTH - NMAKF
2%
Poorly correlated
+11.95%
More