ADNT
Price
$21.15
Change
+$0.05 (+0.24%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.68B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MGDDY
Price
$16.73
Change
+$0.03 (+0.18%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
23.44B
94 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ADNT vs MGDDY

Header iconADNT vs MGDDY Comparison
Open Charts ADNT vs MGDDYBanner chart's image
Adient
Price$21.15
Change+$0.05 (+0.24%)
Volume$1.32M
Capitalization1.68B
CIE GENERALE DES ETABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN SA CLERMONT-FERRAND
Price$16.73
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
Volume$159.44K
Capitalization23.44B
ADNT vs MGDDY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ADNT vs. MGDDY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADNT is a Hold and MGDDY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (ADNT: $21.15 vs. MGDDY: $16.73)
Brand notoriety: ADNT and MGDDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ADNT: 130% vs. MGDDY: 78%
Market capitalization -- ADNT: $1.68B vs. MGDDY: $23.44B
ADNT [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $1.68B. MGDDY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $23.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $83.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ADNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGDDY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ADNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGDDY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGDDY is a better buy in the long-term than ADNT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ADNT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGDDY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ADNT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MGDDY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGDDY is a better buy in the short-term than ADNT.

Price Growth

ADNT (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +11.43% price change this week, while MGDDY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +3.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

ADNT is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

MGDDY is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.13% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGDDY($23.4B) has a higher market cap than ADNT($1.68B). ADNT has higher P/E ratio than MGDDY: ADNT (86.55) vs MGDDY (13.18). ADNT YTD gains are higher at: 22.751 vs. MGDDY (10.563). MGDDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.53B vs. ADNT (434M). MGDDY has more cash in the bank: 3.52B vs. ADNT (860M). ADNT has less debt than MGDDY: ADNT (2.39B) vs MGDDY (7.5B). MGDDY has higher revenues than ADNT: MGDDY (26.7B) vs ADNT (14.4B).
ADNTMGDDYADNT / MGDDY
Capitalization1.68B23.4B7%
EBITDA434M4.53B10%
Gain YTD22.75110.563215%
P/E Ratio86.5513.18657%
Revenue14.4B26.7B54%
Total Cash860M3.52B24%
Total Debt2.39B7.5B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ADNT vs MGDDY: Fundamental Ratings
ADNT
MGDDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1624
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10059
SMR RATING
1..100
9494
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
230
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGDDY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ADNT (78) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that MGDDY’s stock grew significantly faster than ADNT’s over the last 12 months.

MGDDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADNT (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that MGDDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADNT’s over the last 12 months.

MGDDY's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as ADNT (94) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that MGDDY’s stock grew similarly to ADNT’s over the last 12 months.

ADNT's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MGDDY (61) in the null industry. This means that ADNT’s stock grew similarly to MGDDY’s over the last 12 months.

ADNT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MGDDY (30) in the null industry. This means that ADNT’s stock grew similarly to MGDDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ADNTMGDDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ADNT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MGDDY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCADX58.65N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor International Discv C
ERHSX15.22-0.04
-0.26%
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sci R
MGOTX8.80-0.16
-1.79%
Victory Mid-Cap Core Growth C
BOSCX17.42-0.34
-1.91%
BNY Mellon Sm Cp Val C
PSBJX26.79-0.74
-2.69%
Principal SmallCap J

ADNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADNT has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADNT jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ADNT
1D Price
Change %
ADNT100%
+0.24%
LEA - ADNT
70%
Closely correlated
-1.69%
VC - ADNT
70%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
MGA - ADNT
68%
Closely correlated
-1.77%
THRM - ADNT
67%
Closely correlated
-3.01%
ALV - ADNT
67%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
More

MGDDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGDDY has been loosely correlated with VLEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGDDY jumps, then VLEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGDDY
1D Price
Change %
MGDDY100%
+0.24%
VLEEY - MGDDY
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.40%
LEA - MGDDY
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
CTTAY - MGDDY
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
MGA - MGDDY
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
ADNT - MGDDY
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
More