Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADME vs FFLS
ADME vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADME vs. FFLS commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADME is a Hold and FFLS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ADME has more net assets: 251M vs. FFLS (40M). ADME has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: ADME (11.343) vs FFLS (7.469). ADME was incepted earlier than FFLS: ADME (9 years) vs FFLS (2 years). ADME (0.79) has a lower expense ratio than FFLS (1.24). FFLS has a higher turnover ADME (40.00) vs ADME (40.00).
| ADME | FFLS | ADME / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 11.343 | 7.469 | 152% |
| Net Assets | 251M | 40M | 628% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Turnover | 40.00 | 313.00 | 13% |
| Yield | 0.39 | 0.16 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ADME | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 67% | 9 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
ADME and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADME has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADME jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADME | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| MS - ADME | 78% Closely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| AMZN - ADME | 76% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| BLK - ADME | 75% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| C - ADME | 74% Closely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| MAR - ADME | 74% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.57% | ||
More | ||||