ADDDF
Price
$195.99
Change
+$5.98 (+3.15%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
35.13B
ASCCY
Price
$28.82
Change
+$0.81 (+2.89%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
20.68B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ADDDF vs ASCCY

Header iconADDDF vs ASCCY Comparison
Open Charts ADDDF vs ASCCYBanner chart's image
adidas AG
Price$195.99
Change+$5.98 (+3.15%)
Volume$38.96K
Capitalization35.13B
Asics
Price$28.82
Change+$0.81 (+2.89%)
Volume$16.41K
Capitalization20.68B
ADDDF vs ASCCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ADDDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ASCCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ADDDF vs. ASCCY commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADDDF is a Hold and ASCCY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (ADDDF: $195.99 vs. ASCCY: $28.82)
Brand notoriety: ADDDF and ASCCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wholesale Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ADDDF: 1594% vs. ASCCY: 104%
Market capitalization -- ADDDF: $35.13B vs. ASCCY: $20.68B
ADDDF [@Wholesale Distributors] is valued at $35.13B. ASCCY’s [@Wholesale Distributors] market capitalization is $20.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry ranges from $113.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry is $8.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ADDDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileASCCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ADDDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ASCCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASCCY is a better buy in the long-term than ADDDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ADDDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ASCCY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ADDDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ASCCY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASCCY is a better buy in the short-term than ADDDF.

Price Growth

ADDDF (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а +1.99% price change this week, while ASCCY (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was +22.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +3.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wholesale Distributors (+3.67% weekly)

Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ADDDF($35.1B) has a higher market cap than ASCCY($20.7B). ASCCY has higher P/E ratio than ADDDF: ASCCY (40.51) vs ADDDF (25.13). ASCCY YTD gains are higher at: 46.369 vs. ADDDF (-18.641).
ADDDFASCCYADDDF / ASCCY
Capitalization35.1B20.7B170%
EBITDA2.99BN/A-
Gain YTD-18.64146.369-40%
P/E Ratio25.1340.5162%
Revenue24.5BN/A-
Total Cash1.43BN/A-
Total Debt5.48BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ADDDF vs ASCCY: Fundamental Ratings
ADDDF
ASCCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
510
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
4153
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10028
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ADDDF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASCCY (92). This means that ADDDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASCCY’s over the last 12 months.

ASCCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ADDDF (100). This means that ASCCY’s stock grew significantly faster than ADDDF’s over the last 12 months.

ADDDF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as ASCCY (53). This means that ADDDF’s stock grew similarly to ASCCY’s over the last 12 months.

ASCCY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADDDF (89). This means that ASCCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADDDF’s over the last 12 months.

ASCCY's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ADDDF (100). This means that ASCCY’s stock grew significantly faster than ADDDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ADDDFASCCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ADDDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ASCCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LNSR12.650.15
+1.20%
LENSAR
BCTX0.74N/A
+0.14%
Briacell Therapeutics Corp NEW
NTGR24.37-0.09
-0.37%
NETGEAR
ATO165.37-0.76
-0.46%
Atmos Energy Corp
USLM117.29-4.29
-3.53%
United States Lime & Minerals

ADDDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADDDF has been closely correlated with ADDYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADDDF jumps, then ADDYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ADDDF
1D Price
Change %
ADDDF100%
+3.15%
ADDYY - ADDDF
73%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
PUMSY - ADDDF
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
HNNMY - ADDDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
MONRY - ADDDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
BOSSY - ADDDF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ASCCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASCCY and COLM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASCCY and COLM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASCCY
1D Price
Change %
ASCCY100%
+2.90%
COLM - ASCCY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
ASCCF - ASCCY
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AREB - ASCCY
15%
Poorly correlated
-4.13%
BSDGY - ASCCY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADDDF - ASCCY
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.15%
More