Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWZX vs NRGSX
ACWZX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts ACWZX vs NRGSX
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Z
Price$19.06
Change-$0.58 (-2.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.99M
ACWZX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.49B vs. ACWZX (40M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than ACWZX: NRGSX (0.48) vs ACWZX (0.00). ACWZX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: ACWZX (4 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). ACWZX (1.05) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). ACWZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACWZX: NRGSX (0) vs ACWZX (5000000). ACWZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. NRGSX (-12.75).
| ACWZX | NRGSX | ACWZX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.74 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.74 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.438 | 5.452 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40M | 8.49B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.87 | -12.75 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.21 | -6.33 | -366% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -23.10 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.83 | - |