Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWV vs MOTG
ACWV vs MOTG Comparison
Open Charts ACWV vs MOTG
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
Price$120.19
Change-$0.40 (-0.33%)
Volume$48.74K
Net Assets3.35B
VanEck Morningstar Glb Wd Mt ETF
Price$44.83
Change-$0.69 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.2M
ACWV vs MOTG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWV vs. MOTG commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWV is a StrongBuy and MOTG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACWV has more net assets: 3.35B vs. MOTG (18.2M). MOTG has a higher annual dividend yield than ACWV: MOTG (25.593) vs ACWV (11.175). ACWV was incepted earlier than MOTG: ACWV (14 years) vs MOTG (7 years). ACWV (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than MOTG (0.52). MOTG has a higher turnover ACWV (25.00) vs ACWV (25.00).
| ACWV | MOTG | ACWV / MOTG | |
| Gain YTD | 11.175 | 25.593 | 44% |
| Net Assets | 3.35B | 18.2M | 18,418% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.52 | 38% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 78.00 | 32% |
| Yield | 2.38 | 4.48 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ACWV | MOTG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 30 days ago 67% | 11 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 3 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
ACWV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACWV has been closely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACWV jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACWV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| LIN - ACWV | 76% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| L - ACWV | 74% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| TRV - ACWV | 69% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| MA - ACWV | 67% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| ROP - ACWV | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
More | ||||
MOTG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOTG has been loosely correlated with GEHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOTG jumps, then GEHC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOTG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOTG | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| GEHC - MOTG | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.14% | ||
| RTO - MOTG | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| AM - MOTG | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| BAER - MOTG | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| MO - MOTG | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
More | ||||