Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWV vs MOTG
ACWV vs MOTG Comparison
Open Charts ACWV vs MOTG
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
Price$119.64
Change+$0.12 (+0.10%)
Volume$15.6K
Net Assets3.32B
VanEck Morningstar Glb Wd Mt ETF
Price$39.02
Change+$0.14 (+0.36%)
Volume$24.01K
Net Assets15.53M
ACWV vs MOTG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWV vs. MOTG commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWV is a Buy and MOTG is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACWV has more net assets: 3.32B vs. MOTG (15.5M). ACWV has a higher annual dividend yield than MOTG: ACWV (10.555) vs MOTG (7.289). ACWV was incepted earlier than MOTG: ACWV (14 years) vs MOTG (7 years). ACWV (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than MOTG (0.52). MOTG has a higher turnover ACWV (27.00) vs ACWV (27.00).
| ACWV | MOTG | ACWV / MOTG | |
| Gain YTD | 10.555 | 7.289 | 145% |
| Net Assets | 3.32B | 15.5M | 21,432% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.52 | 38% |
| Turnover | 27.00 | 78.00 | 35% |
| Yield | 2.32 | 4.55 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ACWV | MOTG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 68% | 10 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
ACWV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACWV has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACWV jumps, then L could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACWV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| L - ACWV | 74% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| LIN - ACWV | 73% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| TRV - ACWV | 69% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| MA - ACWV | 67% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| ROP - ACWV | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||
MOTG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOTG has been loosely correlated with GEHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOTG jumps, then GEHC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOTG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOTG | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| GEHC - MOTG | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| RTO - MOTG | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
| AM - MOTG | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.00% | ||
| BAER - MOTG | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MO - MOTG | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||