Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWV vs DIVS
ACWV vs DIVS Comparison
Open Charts ACWV vs DIVS
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
Price$121.77
Change+$0.55 (+0.45%)
Volume$476
Net Assets3.4B
Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF
Price$32.50
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.5M
ACWV vs DIVS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWV vs. DIVS commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWV is a Buy and DIVS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACWV has more net assets: 3.4B vs. DIVS (42.5M). DIVS has a higher annual dividend yield than ACWV: DIVS (4.914) vs ACWV (2.080). ACWV was incepted earlier than DIVS: ACWV (14 years) vs DIVS (14 years). ACWV (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than DIVS (0.66). ACWV has a higher turnover DIVS (10.07) vs DIVS (10.07).
| ACWV | DIVS | ACWV / DIVS | |
| Gain YTD | 2.080 | 4.914 | 42% |
| Net Assets | 3.4B | 42.5M | 7,998% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.66 | 30% |
| Turnover | 27.00 | 10.07 | 268% |
| Yield | 2.05 | 1.62 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ACWV | DIVS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
ACWV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACWV has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACWV jumps, then L could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACWV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| L - ACWV | 74% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| LIN - ACWV | 71% Closely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| TRV - ACWV | 69% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| ROP - ACWV | 68% Closely correlated | -6.38% | ||
| MA - ACWV | 67% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
More | ||||
DIVS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DIVS and AVGO have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DIVS and AVGO's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DIVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIVS | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| AVGO - DIVS | 10% Poorly correlated | -3.26% | ||
| TSM - DIVS | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.64% | ||
| MDLZ - DIVS | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.33% | ||
| VFC - DIVS | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.90% | ||
| MSFT - DIVS | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.87% | ||
More | ||||