| ACWV | CZAR | ACWV / CZAR | |
| Gain YTD | 10.555 | 11.684 | 90% |
| Net Assets | 3.32B | 1.61M | 206,335% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.35 | 57% |
| Turnover | 27.00 | 84.00 | 32% |
| Yield | 2.32 | 0.84 | 277% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 2 years | - |
| ACWV | CZAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 48% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GBAT | 1.61 | 0.02 | +1.26% |
| Grayscale Basic Attention Token Trust (BAT) | |||
| RILA | 11.79 | 0.03 | +0.22% |
| Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF | |||
| SPGM | 77.48 | 0.14 | +0.18% |
| SPDR® Portfolio MSCI Global Stk Mkt ETF | |||
| UMAY | 36.56 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-May | |||
| HGLB | 9.22 | -0.10 | -1.07% |
| Highland Global Allocation Fund | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACWV has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACWV jumps, then L could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACWV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| L - ACWV | 74% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| LIN - ACWV | 73% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| TRV - ACWV | 69% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| MA - ACWV | 67% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| ROP - ACWV | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZAR has been loosely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZAR jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZAR | 100% | N/A | ||
| LIN - CZAR | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| BLK - CZAR | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| V - CZAR | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| ADI - CZAR | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| FTV - CZAR | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||