Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWV vs BLES
ACWV vs BLES Comparison
Open Charts ACWV vs BLES
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
Price$118.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$80.23K
Net Assets3.27B
Inspire Global Hope ETF
Price$41.90
Change+$0.06 (+0.14%)
Volume$71.48K
Net Assets117.29M
ACWV vs BLES Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWV vs. BLES commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWV is a Buy and BLES is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACWV has more net assets: 3.27B vs. BLES (117M). BLES has a higher annual dividend yield than ACWV: BLES (14.604) vs ACWV (9.704). ACWV was incepted earlier than BLES: ACWV (14 years) vs BLES (8 years). ACWV (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than BLES (0.58). BLES has a higher turnover ACWV (25.00) vs ACWV (25.00).
| ACWV | BLES | ACWV / BLES | |
| Gain YTD | 9.704 | 14.604 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 3.27B | 117M | 2,791% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.58 | 34% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 41.00 | 61% |
| Yield | 2.37 | 1.77 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ACWV | BLES | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 68% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ACWV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACWV has been closely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACWV jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACWV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | 100% | +0.01% | ||
| LIN - ACWV | 77% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| ALL - ACWV | 68% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| WTW - ACWV | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| GEN - ACWV | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| ROP - ACWV | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||
BLES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLES has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLES jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLES | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| BN - BLES | 73% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| OC - BLES | 71% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| ACA - BLES | 67% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| GEN - BLES | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| GFS - BLES | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.91% | ||
More | ||||