ACWRF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
DBX
Price
$27.67
Change
-$0.24 (-0.86%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
90 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ACWRF vs DBX

Header iconACWRF vs DBX Comparison
Open Charts ACWRF vs DBXBanner chart's image
Acceleware
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
CapitalizationN/A
Dropbox
Price$27.67
Change-$0.24 (-0.86%)
Volume$2.89M
CapitalizationN/A
ACWRF vs DBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
DBX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACWRF vs. DBX commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWRF is a Hold and DBX is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (ACWRF: $0.11 vs. DBX: $27.67)
Brand notoriety: ACWRF: Not notable vs. DBX: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACWRF: 170% vs. DBX: 104%
Market capitalization -- ACWRF: $21.93M vs. DBX: $8.36B
ACWRF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $21.93M. DBX’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $8.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACWRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDBX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACWRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DBX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DBX is a better buy in the long-term than ACWRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DBX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DBX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ACWRF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DBX (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

DBX is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBX($8.36B) has a higher market cap than ACWRF($21.9M). DBX YTD gains are higher at: -6.140 vs. ACWRF (-36.453). DBX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 554M vs. ACWRF (-2.96M). DBX has more cash in the bank: 1.36B vs. ACWRF (1M). ACWRF has less debt than DBX: ACWRF (1.3M) vs DBX (2.03B). DBX has higher revenues than ACWRF: DBX (2.5B) vs ACWRF (349K).
ACWRFDBXACWRF / DBX
Capitalization21.9M8.36B0%
EBITDA-2.96M554M-1%
Gain YTD-36.453-6.140594%
P/E RatioN/A18.55-
Revenue349K2.5B0%
Total Cash1M1.36B0%
Total Debt1.3M2.03B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACWRF vs DBX: Fundamental Ratings
ACWRF
DBX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3869
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9549
SMR RATING
1..100
1005
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10077
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DBX's Valuation (2) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as ACWRF (9) in the null industry. This means that DBX’s stock grew similarly to ACWRF’s over the last 12 months.

DBX's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACWRF (95) in the null industry. This means that DBX’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACWRF’s over the last 12 months.

DBX's SMR Rating (5) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACWRF (100) in the null industry. This means that DBX’s stock grew significantly faster than ACWRF’s over the last 12 months.

DBX's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as ACWRF (50) in the null industry. This means that DBX’s stock grew similarly to ACWRF’s over the last 12 months.

DBX's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as ACWRF (100) in the null industry. This means that DBX’s stock grew similarly to ACWRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DBX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

ACWRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACWRF and ESTC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACWRF and ESTC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACWRF
1D Price
Change %
ACWRF100%
N/A
ESTC - ACWRF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
DBX - ACWRF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
OKTA - ACWRF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
PALT - ACWRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
UBER - ACWRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
More

DBX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBX has been loosely correlated with ADBE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DBX jumps, then ADBE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBX
1D Price
Change %
DBX100%
-0.86%
ADBE - DBX
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
PTC - DBX
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
BOX - DBX
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
TENB - DBX
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
PRO - DBX
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
More