| ACWI | BLES | ACWI / BLES | |
| Gain YTD | 2.276 | 3.894 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 26.4B | 138M | 19,130% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.58 | 55% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 41.00 | 7% |
| Yield | 1.55 | 1.97 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| ACWI | BLES | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 29 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 69% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CCIF | 4.79 | 0.06 | +1.27% |
| Carlyle Credit Income Fund | |||
| QINT | 66.30 | 0.34 | +0.52% |
| American Century Quality Dvrs Intl ETF | |||
| GMUN | 51.02 | 0.06 | +0.11% |
| Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF | |||
| RGEF | 31.29 | -0.07 | -0.23% |
| Rockefeller Global Equity ETF | |||
| TDIV | 98.86 | -0.53 | -0.53% |
| First Trust NASDAQ Technology Div ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACWI has been loosely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACWI jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACWI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWI | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| AAPL - ACWI | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| AVGO - ACWI | 57% Loosely correlated | -4.15% | ||
| MSFT - ACWI | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| AMZN - ACWI | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| META - ACWI | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLES has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLES jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLES | 100% | +0.63% | ||
| BN - BLES | 81% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| NDSN - BLES | 77% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| PH - BLES | 74% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| DOV - BLES | 74% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| QCOM - BLES | 74% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
More | ||||