Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWEX vs FNRCX
ACWEX vs FNRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWEX vs. FNRCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWEX is a Buy and FNRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNRCX has more cash in the bank: 952M vs. ACWEX (157M). FNRCX pays higher dividends than ACWEX: FNRCX (0.71) vs ACWEX (0.25). ACWEX was incepted earlier than FNRCX: ACWEX (12 years) vs FNRCX (28 years). ACWEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than FNRCX (1.73). ACWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 161.00 vs. FNRCX (31.00). ACWEX (0) and FNRCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ACWEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.11 vs. FNRCX (11.05). FNRCX return over 5 years is better than : 264.44 vs. ACWEX (241.97).
| ACWEX | FNRCX | ACWEX / FNRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.73 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.73 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.599 | 10.671 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 952M | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.71 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.11 | 11.05 | 300% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.02 | 43.76 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 241.97 | 264.44 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.60 | 91.92 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement