Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWEX vs FNARX
ACWEX vs FNARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWEX vs. FNARX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWEX is a Hold and FNARX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 690M vs. ACWEX (176M). FNARX pays higher dividends than ACWEX: FNARX (1.31) vs ACWEX (0.02). ACWEX was incepted earlier than FNARX: ACWEX (12 years) vs FNARX (29 years). ACWEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). ACWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 161.00 vs. FNARX (68.00). ACWEX (0) and FNARX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.87 vs. ACWEX (17.86). FNARX (175.25) and ACWEX (168.56) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ACWEX | FNARX | ACWEX / FNARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.69 | 280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.69 | 320% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.466 | 29.365 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 176M | 690M | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.31 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.86 | 18.87 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.67 | 37.77 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 168.56 | 175.25 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.76 | 126.29 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers