Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWEX vs FNARX
ACWEX vs FNARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWEX vs. FNARX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWEX is a Hold and FNARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 826M vs. ACWEX (212M). FNARX pays higher dividends than ACWEX: FNARX (1.69) vs ACWEX (0.02). ACWEX was incepted earlier than FNARX: ACWEX (12 years) vs FNARX (29 years). ACWEX (2.19) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). ACWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. FNARX (68.00). ACWEX (0) and FNARX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.87 vs. ACWEX (33.38). FNARX return over 5 years is better than : 196.75 vs. ACWEX (159.54).
| ACWEX | FNARX | ACWEX / FNARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.69 | 277% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.69 | 317% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.058 | 11.007 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 826M | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.69 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.38 | 39.87 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.98 | 53.40 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 159.54 | 196.75 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 198.52 | 202.90 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers