Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWEX vs FAGNX
ACWEX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWEX vs. FAGNX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWEX is a Buy and FAGNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 952M vs. ACWEX (157M). FAGNX pays higher dividends than ACWEX: FAGNX (0.75) vs ACWEX (0.25). ACWEX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: ACWEX (12 years) vs FAGNX (38 years). ACWEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). ACWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 161.00 vs. FAGNX (31.00). ACWEX (0) and FAGNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ACWEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.11 vs. FAGNX (11.63). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 273.28 vs. ACWEX (241.97).
| ACWEX | FAGNX | ACWEX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.23 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.23 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.599 | 11.094 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 952M | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.75 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.11 | 11.63 | 285% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.02 | 45.91 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 241.97 | 273.28 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.60 | 98.46 | 147% |