Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWDX vs NRGSX
ACWDX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts ACWDX vs NRGSX
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth N
Price$19.39
Change+$0.24 (+1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.51M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.83
Change+$0.89 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.56B
ACWDX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWDX vs. NRGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWDX is a Buy and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.56B vs. ACWDX (39.5M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than ACWDX: NRGSX (0.07) vs ACWDX (0.00). ACWDX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: ACWDX (15 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). ACWDX (1.24) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). ACWDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACWDX: NRGSX (0) vs ACWDX (2000). ACWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.57 vs. NRGSX (-14.38). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -7.82 vs. ACWDX (-21.41).
| ACWDX | NRGSX | ACWDX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.74 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.74 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.201 | -3.565 | -314% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.5M | 8.56B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | -14.38 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.46 | -2.58 | -1,335% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.41 | -7.82 | 274% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.20 | 7.54 | 387% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers