Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWDX vs NRGSX
ACWDX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts ACWDX vs NRGSX
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth N
Price$18.64
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.27M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.80
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.68B
ACWDX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWDX vs. NRGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWDX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.69B vs. ACWDX (38.3M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than ACWDX: NRGSX (0.06) vs ACWDX (0.00). ACWDX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: ACWDX (15 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). ACWDX (1.24) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). ACWDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACWDX: NRGSX (0) vs ACWDX (2000). ACWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. NRGSX (-10.12). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -2.32 vs. ACWDX (-17.27).
| ACWDX | NRGSX | ACWDX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.74 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.74 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.183 | -3.902 | -210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.3M | 8.69B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | -10.12 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.72 | 5.90 | 758% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.27 | -2.32 | 744% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.85 | 10.24 | 272% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement