Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACVF vs SPLG
ACVF vs SPLG Comparison
Open Charts ACVF vs SPLG
American Conservative Values ETF
Price$49.08
Change+$0.21 (+0.43%)
Volume$7.87K
Net Assets135.03M
SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500® ETF
Price$78.16
Change+$0.43 (+0.55%)
Volume$17.26M
Net Assets90.62B
ACVF vs SPLG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACVF vs. SPLG commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACVF is a Hold and SPLG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPLG has more net assets: 90.6B vs. ACVF (135M). SPLG has a higher annual dividend yield than ACVF: SPLG (14.435) vs ACVF (12.793). ACVF was incepted earlier than SPLG: ACVF (5 years) vs SPLG (20 years). SPLG (0.02) has a lower expense ratio than ACVF (0.75). ACVF has a higher turnover SPLG (3.00) vs SPLG (3.00).
| ACVF | SPLG | ACVF / SPLG | |
| Gain YTD | 12.793 | 14.435 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 135M | 90.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.02 | 3,750% |
| Turnover | 6.37 | 3.00 | 212% |
| Yield | 0.59 | 1.16 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ACVF | SPLG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 13 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 72% | 9 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NVDX | 18.16 | 0.25 | +1.37% |
| T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | |||
| GMOV | 26.11 | 0.23 | +0.88% |
| GMO US Value ETF | |||
| GSIE | 41.18 | 0.04 | +0.10% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Intl Eq ETF | |||
| SMOG | 131.86 | 0.13 | +0.10% |
| VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | |||
| RAYC | 18.01 | -0.22 | -1.18% |
| Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF | |||
ACVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACVF has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACVF jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACVF | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| PH - ACVF | 81% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| EMR - ACVF | 80% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| BX - ACVF | 79% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| KKR - ACVF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| MS - ACVF | 78% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
More | ||||