ACUT vs CLRPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACUT is a Hold and CLRPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACUT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLRPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ACUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CLRPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
ACUT (@Biotechnology) experienced а +15.04% price change this week, while CLRPF (@Biotechnology) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.23%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (-2.07% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
| ACUT | CLRPF | ACUT / CLRPF | |
| Capitalization | 4.76M | 1.48B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -32.891 | 268.217 | -12% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
ACUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACUT and LGVN have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACUT and LGVN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACUT | 100% | +16.64% | ||
| LGVN - ACUT | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.89% | ||
| OKYO - ACUT | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.63% | ||
| IGMS - ACUT | 21% Poorly correlated | -9.42% | ||
| APVO - ACUT | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
| VRNA - ACUT | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.22% | ||
More | ||||
CLRPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLRPF and ENLV have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLRPF and ENLV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLRPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLRPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ENLV - CLRPF | 22% Poorly correlated | -8.47% | ||
| JBPHF - CLRPF | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MLTX - CLRPF | 11% Poorly correlated | +2.82% | ||
| TELIF - CLRPF | 10% Poorly correlated | +5.40% | ||
| ACUT - CLRPF | 9% Poorly correlated | +16.64% | ||
More | ||||