It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNUS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NUS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ACU (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -0.21% price change this week, while NUS (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +3.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.13%.
ACU is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.
NUS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
ACU | NUS | ACU / NUS | |
Capitalization | 145M | 529M | 27% |
EBITDA | 20.5M | 197M | 10% |
Gain YTD | 3.985 | 58.308 | 7% |
P/E Ratio | 14.99 | 5.27 | 285% |
Revenue | 194M | 1.63B | 12% |
Total Cash | N/A | 265M | - |
Total Debt | 34.2M | 311M | 11% |
ACU | NUS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NUS's Valuation (34) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as ACU (45) in the Tools And Hardware industry. This means that NUS’s stock grew similarly to ACU’s over the last 12 months.
ACU's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Tools And Hardware industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NUS (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that ACU’s stock grew somewhat faster than NUS’s over the last 12 months.
NUS's SMR Rating (57) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as ACU (73) in the Tools And Hardware industry. This means that NUS’s stock grew similarly to ACU’s over the last 12 months.
NUS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACU (78) in the Tools And Hardware industry. This means that NUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACU’s over the last 12 months.
ACU's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Tools And Hardware industry is in the same range as NUS (26) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that ACU’s stock grew similarly to NUS’s over the last 12 months.
ACU | NUS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago55% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago67% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago71% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago64% | 3 days ago65% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 10 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 10 days ago89% | 3 days ago63% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago66% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GEQYX | 66.07 | 0.35 | +0.53% |
GuideStone Funds Equity Index Instl | |||
RSPFX | 27.30 | 0.13 | +0.48% |
Victory RS Partners A | |||
CIPSX | 20.91 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
Champlain Small Company Adv | |||
EAMAX | 19.86 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Equity A | |||
MASOX | 10.70 | -0.01 | -0.09% |
MoA Small Cap Equity Index Fund |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACU has been loosely correlated with SPB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACU jumps, then SPB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACU | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ACU | 100% | +0.82% | ||
SPB - ACU | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.60% | ||
HNST - ACU | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IPAR - ACU | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.47% | ||
NUS - ACU | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
EWCZ - ACU | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NUS has been loosely correlated with SKIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NUS jumps, then SKIN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NUS | 100% | +0.28% | ||
SKIN - NUS | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
ELF - NUS | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
IPAR - NUS | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.47% | ||
SPB - NUS | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.60% | ||
COTY - NUS | 29% Poorly correlated | +4.58% | ||
More |