ACSYF
Price
$0.64
Change
+$0.04 (+6.67%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
297.47M
SSD
Price
$156.79
Change
-$2.70 (-1.69%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
8.55B
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACSYF vs SSD

Header iconACSYF vs SSD Comparison
Open Charts ACSYF vs SSDBanner chart's image
Accsys Technologies
Price$0.64
Change+$0.04 (+6.67%)
Volume$12.32K
Capitalization297.47M
Simpson Manufacturing
Price$156.79
Change-$2.70 (-1.69%)
Volume$306.33K
Capitalization8.55B
ACSYF vs SSD Comparison Chart
Loading...
SSD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACSYF vs. SSD commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACSYF is a Hold and SSD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ACSYF: $0.64 vs. SSD: $152.89)
Brand notoriety: ACSYF and SSD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Forest Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACSYF: 470% vs. SSD: 94%
Market capitalization -- ACSYF: $297.47M vs. SSD: $8.55B
ACSYF [@Forest Products] is valued at $297.47M. SSD’s [@Forest Products] market capitalization is $8.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $9.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $2.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACSYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSSD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACSYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SSD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SSD is a better buy in the long-term than ACSYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SSD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SSD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

ACSYF (@Forest Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SSD (@Forest Products) price change was -1.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was +0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

SSD is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (+0.18% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSD($8.55B) has a higher market cap than ACSYF($297M). ACSYF YTD gains are higher at: -0.312 vs. SSD (-7.484). SSD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 554M vs. ACSYF (-46.24M). SSD has more cash in the bank: 430M vs. ACSYF (18.1M). ACSYF has less debt than SSD: ACSYF (79.5M) vs SSD (552M). SSD has higher revenues than ACSYF: SSD (2.21B) vs ACSYF (124M).
ACSYFSSDACSYF / SSD
Capitalization297M8.55B3%
EBITDA-46.24M554M-8%
Gain YTD-0.312-7.4844%
P/E RatioN/A24.38-
Revenue124M2.21B6%
Total Cash18.1M430M4%
Total Debt79.5M552M14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACSYF vs SSD: Fundamental Ratings
ACSYF
SSD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4215
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10034
SMR RATING
1..100
9648
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
260
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SSD's Valuation (18) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACSYF (98) in the null industry. This means that SSD’s stock grew significantly faster than ACSYF’s over the last 12 months.

SSD's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACSYF (100) in the null industry. This means that SSD’s stock grew significantly faster than ACSYF’s over the last 12 months.

SSD's SMR Rating (48) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACSYF (96) in the null industry. This means that SSD’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACSYF’s over the last 12 months.

ACSYF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SSD (60) in the Building Products industry. This means that ACSYF’s stock grew similarly to SSD’s over the last 12 months.

ACSYF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSD (60) in the Building Products industry. This means that ACSYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SSD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SSD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

ACSYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACSYF and CFPZF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACSYF and CFPZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACSYF
1D Price
Change %
ACSYF100%
N/A
CFPZF - ACSYF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.41%
UFPI - ACSYF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
SSD - ACSYF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.95%
HMTC - ACSYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSTO - ACSYF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SSD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSD has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SSD jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSD
1D Price
Change %
SSD100%
-2.95%
UFPI - SSD
71%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
WFG - SSD
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.38%
IFSPF - SSD
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
ACAZF - SSD
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
CFPZF - SSD
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.41%
More