Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACSI vs RECS
ACSI vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts ACSI vs RECS
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
Price$66.16
Change+$0.54 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.91M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$39.05
Change-$0.15 (-0.38%)
Volume$1.91M
Net Assets3.57B
ACSI vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACSI vs. RECS commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACSI is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.57B vs. ACSI (103M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than ACSI: RECS (12.796) vs ACSI (7.377). ACSI was incepted earlier than RECS: ACSI (9 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than ACSI (0.65). ACSI has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| ACSI | RECS | ACSI / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 7.377 | 12.796 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 103M | 3.57B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.15 | 433% |
| Turnover | 60.00 | 49.00 | 122% |
| Yield | 0.64 | 0.62 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ACSI | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ACSI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACSI has been loosely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACSI jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACSI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACSI | 100% | N/A | ||
| PRU - ACSI | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| HLT - ACSI | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| META - ACSI | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| TXRH - ACSI | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| PINS - ACSI | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +4.14% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||