Advertisement
ACSAY vs PWR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACSAY is a StrongBuy and PWR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACSAY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- ACSAY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACSAY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACSAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ACSAY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +3.63% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +5.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +276.58%.
Reported Earning Dates
ACSAY is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+0.01% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| ACSAY | PWR | ACSAY / PWR | |
| Capitalization | 17B | 59.8B | 28% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.062 | 27.732 | 141% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.47 | 65.05 | 28% |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 4.75B | - |
ACSAY | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 5 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ACSAY's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as PWR (93) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ACSAY’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
ACSAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as PWR (8) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ACSAY’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
ACSAY's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as PWR (58) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ACSAY’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACSAY (40) in the null industry. This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACSAY’s over the last 12 months.
ACSAY's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as PWR (25) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ACSAY’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
| ACSAY | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 48% | 14 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| YFFI | 9.98 | 0.02 | +0.20% |
| Indexperts Yield Focused Fxd Inc ETF | |||
| HDGE | 16.81 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | |||
| XBIL | 50.08 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| F/m US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF | |||
| ETX | 18.02 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| EATON VANCE Municipal Income 2028 TERM TRUST | |||
| XLE | 85.96 | -0.70 | -0.81% |
| The Energy Select Sector SPDR® ETF | |||
ACSAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACSAY has been loosely correlated with VCISY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACSAY jumps, then VCISY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACSAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACSAY | 100% | +1.40% | ||
| VCISY - ACSAY | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| PWR - ACSAY | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
| ACA - ACSAY | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
| NVEE - ACSAY | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PRIM - ACSAY | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.31% | ||
More | ||||
PWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | 100% | +1.36% | ||
| MTZ - PWR | 84% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| FIX - PWR | 83% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| PRIM - PWR | 82% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| EME - PWR | 82% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| STRL - PWR | 79% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
More | ||||