Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs UPAAX
ACRIX vs UPAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. UPAAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Hold and UPAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.44B vs. UPAAX (3.26M). ACRIX pays higher dividends than UPAAX: ACRIX (0.74) vs UPAAX (0.06). ACRIX was incepted earlier than UPAAX: ACRIX (9 years) vs UPAAX (8 years). UPAAX (3.21) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.18). ACRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. UPAAX (0.00). UPAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: UPAAX (2000) vs ACRIX (10000000). UPAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.57 vs. ACRIX (8.39). UPAAX return over 5 years is better than : 68.83 vs. ACRIX (15.85).
| ACRIX | UPAAX | ACRIX / UPAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 3.21 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 3.21 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.342 | 6.207 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 3.26M | 44,247% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.06 | 1,158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.39 | 35.57 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.21 | 83.82 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.85 | 68.83 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement