Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs UPAAX
ACRIX vs UPAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. UPAAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Hold and UPAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. UPAAX (3.45M). ACRIX pays higher dividends than UPAAX: ACRIX (0.72) vs UPAAX (0.06). ACRIX was incepted earlier than UPAAX: ACRIX (9 years) vs UPAAX (8 years). UPAAX (3.21) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.18). ACRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. UPAAX (0.00). UPAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: UPAAX (2000) vs ACRIX (10000000). UPAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.22 vs. ACRIX (5.89). UPAAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.83 vs. ACRIX (14.17).
| ACRIX | UPAAX | ACRIX / UPAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 3.21 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 3.21 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.739 | 5.805 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 3.45M | 42,406% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.06 | 1,201% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 24.22 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.76 | 69.27 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.17 | 51.83 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |