Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs FLMFX
ACRIX vs FLMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLMFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Buy and FLMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. FLMFX (1.02B). FLMFX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLMFX (0.90) vs ACRIX (0.52). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLMFX: ACRIX (9 years) vs FLMFX (37 years). FLMFX (1.20) and ACRIX (1.18) have similar cost to investors . FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). FLMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLMFX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.48 vs. FLMFX (-4.39). FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.45 vs. ACRIX (38.72).
| ACRIX | FLMFX | ACRIX / FLMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.20 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.20 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.386 | 6.357 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.4B | 1.02B | 136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.90 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.48 | -4.39 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.50 | 20.62 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.72 | 43.45 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement