Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs FLMFX
ACRIX vs FLMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLMFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Hold and FLMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. FLMFX (1.17B). FLMFX (0.75) and ACRIX (0.72) have matching dividends . ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLMFX: ACRIX (9 years) vs FLMFX (38 years). FLMFX (1.20) and ACRIX (1.18) have similar cost to investors . FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). FLMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLMFX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). FLMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.26 vs. ACRIX (5.89). FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.00 vs. ACRIX (14.17).
| ACRIX | FLMFX | ACRIX / FLMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.20 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.20 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.739 | 4.200 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 1.17B | 125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.75 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 12.26 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.76 | 25.90 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.17 | 28.00 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement