Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs FLMAX
ACRIX vs FLMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLMAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Buy and FLMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.42B vs. FLMAX (1.08B). FLMAX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLMAX (1.04) vs ACRIX (0.48). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLMAX: ACRIX (9 years) vs FLMAX (9 years). ACRIX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FLMAX (0.91). FLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). FLMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLMAX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.87 vs. FLMAX (-3.18). FLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.79 vs. ACRIX (32.09).
| ACRIX | FLMAX | ACRIX / FLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.817 | 14.689 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 1.08B | 131% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.04 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.87 | -3.18 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.98 | 28.73 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.09 | 43.79 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement