Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs FLMAX
ACRIX vs FLMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLMAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Hold and FLMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.43B vs. FLMAX (1.12B). FLMAX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLMAX (1.04) vs ACRIX (0.48). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLMAX: ACRIX (9 years) vs FLMAX (9 years). ACRIX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FLMAX (0.91). FLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). FLMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLMAX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). FLMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. ACRIX (3.21). FLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.28 vs. ACRIX (17.05).
| ACRIX | FLMAX | ACRIX / FLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.477 | 11.765 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 1.12B | 127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.04 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.21 | 9.13 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.72 | 28.58 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.05 | 33.28 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement