Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs FLDFX
ACRIX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLDFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Hold and FLDFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. FLDFX (433M). FLDFX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLDFX (1.07) vs ACRIX (0.49). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: ACRIX (9 years) vs FLDFX (20 years). FLDFX (1.50) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.18). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 247.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). FLDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLDFX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). ACRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.94 vs. FLDFX (-3.81). ACRIX return over 5 years is better than : 33.87 vs. FLDFX (20.78).
| ACRIX | FLDFX | ACRIX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.50 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.50 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.535 | 9.978 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.4B | 433M | 322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.07 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.94 | -3.81 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.23 | 23.92 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.87 | 20.78 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement