Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs FLDFX
ACRIX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. FLDFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Hold and FLDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.44B vs. FLDFX (447M). FLDFX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: FLDFX (0.92) vs ACRIX (0.74). ACRIX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: ACRIX (9 years) vs FLDFX (20 years). FLDFX (1.50) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.18). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 247.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). FLDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: FLDFX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). FLDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.93 vs. ACRIX (8.39). ACRIX return over 5 years is better than : 15.85 vs. FLDFX (14.46).
| ACRIX | FLDFX | ACRIX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.50 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.50 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.342 | 1.845 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 447M | 323% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.92 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.39 | 11.93 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.21 | 22.39 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.85 | 14.46 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement