Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs CLTAX
ACRIX vs CLTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. CLTAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Hold and CLTAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.43B vs. CLTAX (18M). ACRIX pays higher dividends than CLTAX: ACRIX (0.48) vs CLTAX (0.02). ACRIX was incepted earlier than CLTAX: ACRIX (9 years) vs CLTAX (13 years). CLTAX (2.09) is less costly to investors than ACRIX (1.18). CLTAX (69.00) and ACRIX (66.00) have comparable annual turnover. CLTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: CLTAX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). CLTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.33 vs. ACRIX (3.21). ACRIX return over 5 years is better than : 17.05 vs. CLTAX (-3.02).
| ACRIX | CLTAX | ACRIX / CLTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.53 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.09 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.477 | 6.742 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 18M | 7,933% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.02 | 2,839% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.21 | 4.33 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.72 | 21.44 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.05 | -3.02 | -564% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement