Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACRIX vs BLNAX
ACRIX vs BLNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACRIX vs. BLNAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRIX is a Hold and BLNAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACRIX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. BLNAX (448M). BLNAX pays higher dividends than ACRIX: BLNAX (1.24) vs ACRIX (0.72). ACRIX was incepted earlier than BLNAX: ACRIX (9 years) vs BLNAX (9 years). ACRIX (1.18) and BLNAX (1.13) have similar cost to investors . BLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 247.00 vs. ACRIX (66.00). BLNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACRIX: BLNAX (2500) vs ACRIX (10000000). BLNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.30 vs. ACRIX (5.89). BLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.26 vs. ACRIX (14.17).
| ACRIX | BLNAX | ACRIX / BLNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.13 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.13 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.739 | 3.068 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 2500 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 448M | 325% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.24 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 11.30 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.76 | 23.90 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.17 | 16.26 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers