It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACRFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNOIY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACRFF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
ACRFF (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MNOIY (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.69%.
Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.
ACRFF | MNOIY | ACRFF / MNOIY | |
Capitalization | 11.3B | 3.03B | 373% |
EBITDA | 1.29B | -14.7M | -8,769% |
Gain YTD | -1.193 | 44.885 | -3% |
P/E Ratio | 18.73 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 5.67B | 522M | 1,087% |
Total Cash | 1.14B | 155M | 732% |
Total Debt | 4.27B | 426M | 1,002% |
ACRFF | MNOIY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 49 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ACRFF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNOIY (97). This means that ACRFF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNOIY’s over the last 12 months.
MNOIY's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ACRFF (50). This means that MNOIY’s stock grew similarly to ACRFF’s over the last 12 months.
MNOIY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ACRFF (100). This means that MNOIY’s stock grew similarly to ACRFF’s over the last 12 months.
MNOIY's Price Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as ACRFF (89). This means that MNOIY’s stock grew similarly to ACRFF’s over the last 12 months.
MNOIY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACRFF (47). This means that MNOIY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACRFF’s over the last 12 months.
ACRFF | MNOIY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago51% | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | 3 days ago25% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago48% | 3 days ago27% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago47% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
IYH | 60.38 | 0.36 | +0.60% |
iShares US Healthcare ETF | |||
LEMB | 41.52 | 0.16 | +0.38% |
iShares JP Morgan EM Local Ccy Bd ETF | |||
LOCT | 23.78 | 0.02 | +0.10% |
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buf ETF -Oct | |||
MYCG | 25.09 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
SPDR SSGA My2027 Corporate Bond ETF | |||
EDC | 52.45 | -0.18 | -0.34% |
Direxion Daily MSCI Em Mkts Bull 3X ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACRFF and NHHEF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACRFF and NHHEF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACRFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ACRFF | 100% | +0.21% | ||
NHHEF - ACRFF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HKSHF - ACRFF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ACCYY - ACRFF | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.35% | ||
ICHGF - ACRFF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MNOIY - ACRFF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MNOIY and MNRIF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNOIY and MNRIF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNOIY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MNOIY | 100% | N/A | ||
MNRIF - MNOIY | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MAORF - MNOIY | 12% Poorly correlated | +4.00% | ||
ACCYY - MNOIY | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.35% | ||
HKSHF - MNOIY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ACRFF - MNOIY | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
More |