ACOPY
Price
$5.73
Change
-$0.30 (-4.98%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
4.05B
LYSFY
Price
$10.97
Change
-$0.03 (-0.27%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.02B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACOPY vs LYSFY

Header iconACOPY vs LYSFY Comparison
Open Charts ACOPY vs LYSFYBanner chart's image
The A2 Milk
Price$5.73
Change-$0.30 (-4.98%)
Volume$134
Capitalization4.05B
Leroy Seafood Group ASA
Price$10.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.27%)
Volume$401
Capitalization3.02B
ACOPY vs LYSFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACOPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACOPY vs. LYSFY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACOPY is a Hold and LYSFY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ACOPY: $5.73 vs. LYSFY: $11.00)
Brand notoriety: ACOPY and LYSFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACOPY: 10% vs. LYSFY: 52%
Market capitalization -- ACOPY: $4.05B vs. LYSFY: $3.02B
ACOPY [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $4.05B. LYSFY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $3.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $229.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACOPY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLYSFY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACOPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LYSFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACOPY is a better buy in the long-term than LYSFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACOPY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYSFY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACOPY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LYSFY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LYSFY is a better buy in the short-term than ACOPY.

Price Growth

ACOPY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -3.91% price change this week, while LYSFY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +8.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +186.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-1.41% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACOPY($4.05B) has a higher market cap than LYSFY($3.02B). ACOPY has higher P/E ratio than LYSFY: ACOPY (35.11) vs LYSFY (24.88). ACOPY YTD gains are higher at: 73.475 vs. LYSFY (33.168).
ACOPYLYSFYACOPY / LYSFY
Capitalization4.05B3.02B134%
EBITDAN/A2.48B-
Gain YTD73.47533.168222%
P/E Ratio35.1124.88141%
RevenueN/A33.1B-
Total CashN/A1.94B-
Total DebtN/A12.7B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACOPY vs LYSFY: Fundamental Ratings
ACOPY
LYSFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8946
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
4779
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1612
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LYSFY's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as ACOPY (45). This means that LYSFY’s stock grew similarly to ACOPY’s over the last 12 months.

LYSFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as ACOPY (100). This means that LYSFY’s stock grew similarly to ACOPY’s over the last 12 months.

ACOPY's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSFY (79). This means that ACOPY’s stock grew similarly to LYSFY’s over the last 12 months.

LYSFY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as ACOPY (46). This means that LYSFY’s stock grew similarly to ACOPY’s over the last 12 months.

LYSFY's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as ACOPY (16). This means that LYSFY’s stock grew similarly to ACOPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACOPYLYSFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACOPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNDW69.50-0.06
-0.09%
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
SMB17.40-0.05
-0.29%
VanEck Short Muni ETF
SPAM34.79-0.26
-0.76%
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
IGTR26.14-0.29
-1.09%
Innovator Gradient Tactical Rot Str ETF
NVOH30.70-1.13
-3.54%
NOVO NORDISK A/S (B SHARES) ADRHEDGED NVOH

ACOPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACOPY and ACOPF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACOPY and ACOPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACOPY
1D Price
Change %
ACOPY100%
N/A
ACOPF - ACOPY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMNC - ACOPY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYSFY - ACOPY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMNCB - ACOPY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFFY - ACOPY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LYSFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LYSFY and CIADF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LYSFY and CIADF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYSFY
1D Price
Change %
LYSFY100%
N/A
CIADF - LYSFY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACOPY - LYSFY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEJHY - LYSFY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NFPDF - LYSFY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCRA - LYSFY
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
More