ACOPY
Price
$5.80
Change
+$0.13 (+2.29%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.35B
LYSFY
Price
$10.10
Change
+$0.55 (+5.76%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
2.84B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACOPY vs LYSFY

Header iconACOPY vs LYSFY Comparison
Open Charts ACOPY vs LYSFYBanner chart's image
The A2 Milk
Price$5.80
Change+$0.13 (+2.29%)
Volume$2.08K
Capitalization4.35B
Leroy Seafood Group ASA
Price$10.10
Change+$0.55 (+5.76%)
Volume$475
Capitalization2.84B
ACOPY vs LYSFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACOPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACOPY vs. LYSFY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACOPY is a Buy and LYSFY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ACOPY: $5.80 vs. LYSFY: $10.10)
Brand notoriety: ACOPY and LYSFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACOPY: 112% vs. LYSFY: 47%
Market capitalization -- ACOPY: $4.35B vs. LYSFY: $2.84B
ACOPY [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $4.35B. LYSFY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $2.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACOPY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLYSFY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACOPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LYSFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACOPY is a better buy in the long-term than LYSFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACOPY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYSFY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACOPY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LYSFY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACOPY is a better buy in the short-term than LYSFY.

Price Growth

ACOPY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LYSFY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +895.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.34% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACOPY($4.35B) has a higher market cap than LYSFY($2.84B). ACOPY has higher P/E ratio than LYSFY: ACOPY (35.39) vs LYSFY (23.26). ACOPY YTD gains are higher at: 73.623 vs. LYSFY (22.273).
ACOPYLYSFYACOPY / LYSFY
Capitalization4.35B2.84B154%
EBITDA318MN/A-
Gain YTD73.62322.273331%
P/E Ratio35.3923.26152%
Revenue1.9BN/A-
Total Cash1.1BN/A-
Total Debt101MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACOPY vs LYSFY: Fundamental Ratings
ACOPY
LYSFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9047
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10073
SMR RATING
1..100
4673
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4243
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2216
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LYSFY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACOPY (57). This means that LYSFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACOPY’s over the last 12 months.

LYSFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as ACOPY (100). This means that LYSFY’s stock grew similarly to ACOPY’s over the last 12 months.

ACOPY's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSFY (73). This means that ACOPY’s stock grew similarly to LYSFY’s over the last 12 months.

ACOPY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSFY (43). This means that ACOPY’s stock grew similarly to LYSFY’s over the last 12 months.

LYSFY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as ACOPY (22). This means that LYSFY’s stock grew similarly to ACOPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACOPYLYSFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
55%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACOPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NINCX21.460.37
+1.75%
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value C
BDSIX19.750.23
+1.18%
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Core Instl
RMBJX26.630.22
+0.83%
RMB C
FWCGX72.910.53
+0.73%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc529F3
FEAIX30.910.04
+0.13%
First Eagle Rising Dividend Fund I

ACOPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACOPY and ACOPF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACOPY and ACOPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACOPY
1D Price
Change %
ACOPY100%
N/A
ACOPF - ACOPY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMNC - ACOPY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYSFY - ACOPY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMNCB - ACOPY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFFY - ACOPY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LYSFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LYSFY and CIADF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LYSFY and CIADF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYSFY
1D Price
Change %
LYSFY100%
N/A
CIADF - LYSFY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACOPY - LYSFY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEJHY - LYSFY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NFPDF - LYSFY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCRA - LYSFY
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.50%
More