ACOPY
Price
$4.85
Change
+$0.24 (+5.21%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.46B
LYSFY
Price
$8.97
Change
+$0.42 (+4.91%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
2.49B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACOPY vs LYSFY

Header iconACOPY vs LYSFY Comparison
Open Charts ACOPY vs LYSFYBanner chart's image
The A2 Milk
Price$4.85
Change+$0.24 (+5.21%)
Volume$674
Capitalization2.46B
Leroy Seafood Group ASA
Price$8.97
Change+$0.42 (+4.91%)
Volume$1.44K
Capitalization2.49B
ACOPY vs LYSFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACOPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACOPY vs. LYSFY commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACOPY is a Hold and LYSFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (ACOPY: $4.85 vs. LYSFY: $8.97)
Brand notoriety: ACOPY and LYSFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACOPY: 42% vs. LYSFY: 134%
Market capitalization -- ACOPY: $2.46B vs. LYSFY: $2.49B
ACOPY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $2.46B. LYSFY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $2.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACOPY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLYSFY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACOPY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LYSFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LYSFY is a better buy in the long-term than ACOPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACOPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYSFY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACOPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LYSFY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LYSFY is a better buy in the short-term than ACOPY.

Price Growth

ACOPY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +9.79% price change this week, while LYSFY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +11.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+11.17% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYSFY($2.49B) and ACOPY($2.46B) have the same market capitalization . ACOPY has higher P/E ratio than LYSFY: ACOPY (28.74) vs LYSFY (8.02). ACOPY YTD gains are higher at: 45.184 vs. LYSFY (8.593). LYSFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.12B vs. ACOPY (223M). LYSFY has more cash in the bank: 3.59B vs. ACOPY (887M). ACOPY has less debt than LYSFY: ACOPY (124M) vs LYSFY (9.44B). LYSFY has higher revenues than ACOPY: LYSFY (28.1B) vs ACOPY (1.57B).
ACOPYLYSFYACOPY / LYSFY
Capitalization2.46B2.49B99%
EBITDA223M6.12B4%
Gain YTD45.1848.593526%
P/E Ratio28.748.02358%
Revenue1.57B28.1B6%
Total Cash887M3.59B25%
Total Debt124M9.44B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACOPY vs LYSFY: Fundamental Ratings
ACOPY
LYSFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
5671
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5349
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4255
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LYSFY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACOPY (58). This means that LYSFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACOPY’s over the last 12 months.

LYSFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as ACOPY (100). This means that LYSFY’s stock grew similarly to ACOPY’s over the last 12 months.

ACOPY's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSFY (71). This means that ACOPY’s stock grew similarly to LYSFY’s over the last 12 months.

LYSFY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as ACOPY (53). This means that LYSFY’s stock grew similarly to ACOPY’s over the last 12 months.

ACOPY's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSFY (55). This means that ACOPY’s stock grew similarly to LYSFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACOPYLYSFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
72%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACOPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLPDX5.970.03
+0.51%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income A
RIRCX76.830.01
+0.01%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R3
IGMSX8.76-0.01
-0.11%
Voya Global Insights Portfolio S
TCBAX8.97-0.01
-0.11%
Covered Bridge A
BQLCX22.72-0.08
-0.35%
Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Instl

ACOPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACOPY and ACOPF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACOPY and ACOPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACOPY
1D Price
Change %
ACOPY100%
N/A
ACOPF - ACOPY
28%
Poorly correlated
+7.87%
AMNC - ACOPY
23%
Poorly correlated
-17.00%
LYSFY - ACOPY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMNCB - ACOPY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFFY - ACOPY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LYSFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LYSFY and CIADF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LYSFY and CIADF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYSFY
1D Price
Change %
LYSFY100%
N/A
CIADF - LYSFY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACOPY - LYSFY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEJHY - LYSFY
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
NFPDF - LYSFY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCRA - LYSFY
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
More