Advertisement
ACNFF vs TRNS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACNFF is a Hold and TRNS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACNFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRNS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ACNFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TRNS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACNFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRNS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACNFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TRNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
ACNFF (@Food Distributors) experienced а -1.62% price change this week, while TRNS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +6.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.34%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
TRNS is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food Distributors (-1.17% weekly)Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.20% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
| ACNFF | TRNS | ACNFF / TRNS | |
| Capitalization | 761M | 738M | 103% |
| EBITDA | 94M | 37.7M | 249% |
| Gain YTD | 35.898 | -25.118 | -143% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.19 | 54.99 | 17% |
| Revenue | 1.36B | 278M | 490% |
| Total Cash | 5.63M | 1.52M | 371% |
| Total Debt | 255M | 57.7M | 442% |
ACNFF | TRNS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 54 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 70 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ACNFF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRNS (82) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that ACNFF’s stock grew significantly faster than TRNS’s over the last 12 months.
TRNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as ACNFF (62) in the null industry. This means that TRNS’s stock grew similarly to ACNFF’s over the last 12 months.
ACNFF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as TRNS (83) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that ACNFF’s stock grew similarly to TRNS’s over the last 12 months.
ACNFF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as TRNS (62) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that ACNFF’s stock grew similarly to TRNS’s over the last 12 months.
TRNS's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as ACNFF (89) in the null industry. This means that TRNS’s stock grew similarly to ACNFF’s over the last 12 months.
| ACNFF | TRNS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 20% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 29% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 18% | 4 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 15% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 26% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 14% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 20% | 11 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 42% | 4 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
ACNFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACNFF and ADRZF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACNFF and ADRZF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACNFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACNFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ADRZF - ACNFF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TRNS - ACNFF | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
| GIC - ACNFF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
| WCC - ACNFF | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
| SITE - ACNFF | -3% Poorly correlated | -1.22% | ||
More | ||||
TRNS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRNS has been loosely correlated with BXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRNS jumps, then BXC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRNS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRNS | 100% | -1.04% | ||
| BXC - TRNS | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.34% | ||
| SITE - TRNS | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| DSGR - TRNS | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| WSO - TRNS | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| ABM - TRNS | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
More | ||||