Advertisement
ACNFF vs ADRZF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACNFF is a Buy and ADRZF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACNFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileADRZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ACNFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ADRZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACNFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ADRZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACNFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ADRZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
ACNFF (@Food Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ADRZF (@Electronics Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -2.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.31%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was +3.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.05%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food Distributors (-2.40% weekly)Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.
@Electronics Distributors (+3.87% weekly)Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.
| ACNFF | ADRZF | ACNFF / ADRZF | |
| Capitalization | 794M | 6.91B | 11% |
| EBITDA | 111M | 880M | 13% |
| Gain YTD | 37.957 | 38.184 | 99% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.33 | 12.77 | 73% |
| Revenue | 1.45B | 7.98B | 18% |
| Total Cash | 3.05M | 1.16B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 300M | 740M | 41% |
ACNFF | ADRZF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 47 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ACNFF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as ADRZF (10). This means that ACNFF’s stock grew similarly to ADRZF’s over the last 12 months.
ADRZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as ACNFF (64). This means that ADRZF’s stock grew similarly to ACNFF’s over the last 12 months.
ADRZF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as ACNFF (54). This means that ADRZF’s stock grew similarly to ACNFF’s over the last 12 months.
ACNFF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as ADRZF (50). This means that ACNFF’s stock grew similarly to ADRZF’s over the last 12 months.
ADRZF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACNFF (90). This means that ADRZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACNFF’s over the last 12 months.
| ACNFF | ADRZF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 13% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 27% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 20% | 1 day ago 26% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 27% | 1 day ago 27% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 25% | 1 day ago 30% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 14% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 19% | N/A |
Advertisement
ACNFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACNFF and ADRZF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACNFF and ADRZF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACNFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACNFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ADRZF - ACNFF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TRNS - ACNFF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
| GIC - ACNFF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
| WCC - ACNFF | -2% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
| SITE - ACNFF | -3% Poorly correlated | +3.79% | ||
More | ||||
ADRZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ADRZF and WJXFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ADRZF and WJXFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADRZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADRZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| WJXFF - ADRZF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
| ACNFF - ADRZF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GIC - ADRZF | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
| TITN - ADRZF | -3% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
| TRNS - ADRZF | -4% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||